|
We may not know what will become of microfilms as a category, but there is no doubt it is booming. What is murky is the regulation for it, which so far is made up of only one directive so informal it is titled a "notice", issued jointly by CNNIC and SAPPRFT (the State Administration of Press Publication, Radio, Film and Television).
Essentially, it passes the task of censoring to the websites. Some call it "loose regulation" and some "self-regulation". There are 608 organizations that have obtained licenses from SAPPRET for Internet audio-video programming as of March 2013. Unlike feature films, it is not practical to require each microfilm project to submit for approval of the script and the final edit. So, website staff have to act as guards so to speak.
This worries a lot of people who call for an end to the chaos. But Cui Baoguo, a professor with the Journalism School of Tsinghua University, says the absence of tight regulation is what gives the category hope. "When the government gives too much care and support for a category, it is usually doomed. Look at animation, which is receiving so much blood infusion from all levels of government. Microfilms have more chances of flourishing mainly because it is a grassroots movement."
Related:
Filmmakers capture life in nine short minutes
Golden Rooster honors microfilms
Festival focuses on microfilms
For more coverages by Raymond Zhou, click here
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|