Can we have app-based and normal taxis both?
Updated: 2015-12-09 07:44
By XIN ZHIMING(China Daily)
|
||||||||
Of course, it is much easier to declare carpool services illegal and seize the cars in operation-as has been the case in some cities. But such a move would go against the Internet-Plus initiative put forward by the central leadership early this year. As an Internet-based business, car-sharing service deserves legal support as it can play a significant role in boosting the vitality of China's economy and promoting consumption.
Lawmakers, however, remain divided over the legal status of the business.
Some big cities like Beijing largely have license-based management in the conventional taxi sector. The numbers of taxis in such cities are highly regulated and it is technically very difficult to establish new taxi companies, leading to de facto monopoly in the sector. Besides, conventional taxi drivers have to pay a large percentage of their incomes to their companies as "portion money", which reduces their incomes, forcing them to work overtime to make ends meet. The rise of app-based car services, which are cheaper than taxis because of the heavy subsidies they enjoy for being Internet-based companies, has worsened taxi drivers' situation, which has prompted them to protest against the "unfair competition" from online service providers.
Policymakers have to listen to the voices of conventional taxi drivers and companies, too.
The challenge for policymakers is to strike the right balance between traditional and Internet-based car service providers, and it is a challenge they have to meet.
The authorities, for instance, could consider easing the strict control over taxi licenses and allow the market to decide how many taxis a city or town needs. If new companies are allowed to enter the sector, more competition could prompt conventional car companies to reduce the "portion money" they take from taxi drivers, which would raise the latter's incomes. Also, the entry of app-based companies into the market will lead to better services for passengers.
Policymakers, as a matter of principle, should not side with any interest group. They have to respect the market when it comes to allocation of resources and maintain the market order by strengthening regulation in fields such as passenger safety, service quality and building an even playing field for all competitors.
The author is a senior writer with China Daily. xinzhiming@chinadaily.com.cn
- Global health entering new era: WHO chief
- Brazil's planning minister steps aside after recordings revelation
- Vietnam, US adopt joint statement on advancing comprehensive partnership
- European border closures 'inhumane': UN refugee agency
- Japan's foreign minister calls A-bombings extremely regrettable
- Fukushima impact unprecedented for oceans: US expert
- Stars of Lijiang River: Elderly brothers with white beards
- Wealthy Chinese children paying money to learn British manners
- Military-style wedding: Fighter jets, grooms in dashing uniforms
- Striking photos around the world: May 16 - May 22
- Robots help elderly in nursing home in east China
- Hanging in the air: Chongqing holds rescue drill
- 2.1-ton tofu finishes in two hours in central China
- Six things you may not know about Grain Buds
Most Viewed
Editor's Picks
Anti-graft campaign targets poverty relief |
Cherry blossom signal arrival of spring |
In pictures: Destroying fake and shoddy products |
China's southernmost city to plant 500,000 trees |
Cavers make rare finds in Guangxi expedition |
Cutting hair for Longtaitou Festival |
Today's Top News
Liang avoids jail in shooting death
China's finance minister addresses ratings downgrade
Duke alumni visit Chinese Embassy
Marriott unlikely to top Anbang offer for Starwood: Observers
Chinese biopharma debuts on Nasdaq
What ends Jeb Bush's White House hopes
Investigation for Nicolas's campaign
Will US-ASEAN meeting be good for region?
US Weekly
Geared to go |
The place to be |