Critics fire at congestion tax proposal
Updated: 2015-07-24 21:22
By Nie Ligao(chinadaily.com.cn)
|
|||||||||
|
A former official's suggestions about taxation to prevent congestion drew massive opposition in the media this Friday. Qiu Baoxing, a former vice-minister of housing and urban-rural development in China, proposed in a forum held in Guangzhou that Guangzhou should follow London's tax-adjustment model to prevent traffic jams since the Southern Chinese city has three times the population of London.
"Reform and innovation are worth the risk. The issue that everyone can understand and support is called fashion, not reform," Qiu said.
London imposed the tax on its downtown areas since 2003 and saw improving traffic conditions following its implementation.
The statement was reported on Thursday and an avalanche of opposition ensued on Friday as the proposal struck a nerve with the public. Here are some opinions from the press. One critic surnamed Tao claims on the Beijing News that we need to first improve our public transportation system to meet the basic requirements of the residents. Without a sound public transport network, the congestion fee would only make the city more dysfunctional.
Design flaws by the local governments are to blame for the current traffic situation, a commentator expressed on China Youth Daily. "We should not let the public bear the blame for the government's faults."
In the early 2010, the congestion fee was proposed as one major measure to deal with Beijing's traffic problems. Besides, Shanghai, Guangzhou, Shenzhen and Hangzhou also issued similar draft legislation to test the reaction of the populace but had to abandon the plan due to strong opposition from the whole society.
Optimizing the current traffic network should be the first choice for the local government policymakers, instead of levying a tax, a scholar writes for the New Express Daily, a paper based in Guangzhou.
"Even London's experiences also show that the positive consequences of the congestion tax were phased out after four years," Tao explained. "Guangzhou and other Chinese cities should have a serious discussion from all walks of lifebefore making a final decision on the traffic fee."
- Unusual but true: 'Love' conquers all
- Six dead as rainstorms wreak havoc in China
- Guangzhou Evergrande stun Bayern in penalty shootout
- 10 domestic films to see this summer
- Tricks airports use to scare away birds
- The highs and lows of a stock market investor
- Culture insider: 7 things you may not know about Major Heat
- Future of Great Wall in Hebei province looks bleak
Most Viewed
Editor's Picks
Seventh China-US strategic dialogue |
Premier Li embarks on Latin America visit |
What do we know about AIIB |
Full coverage of Boao Forum for Asia |
Annual legislative and political advisory sessions |
Spring Festival trends reflect a changing China |
Today's Top News
Astronomers discover most Earth-like planet yet
Flight details of Obama's Kenya trip leaked
2 killed, several injured in Louisiana theater shooting
Deficit hits $104b in first half
Obama to meet extended family members in Kenya
More Chinese companies become world top 500
Earth-like planet discovered using NASA's Kepler space telescope
Ministry denies set date for nationwide two-child policy
US Weekly
Geared to go |
The place to be |