Many in West back winds of change in world
Updated: 2015-04-23 07:52
By Martin Khor(China Daily)
|
||||||||
The signing ceremony of memorandum of understanding on establishing the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) is held in Beijing, Oct 24 2014. [Photo/Xinhua] |
Influential Western economic commentators have supported China's move to establish the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank and said US President Barack Obama made a big mistake by pressuring US allies to shun the bank.
What the US has done by doubting the integrity of the AIIB sounds like the pot calling the kettle black, because it is the lack of fair governance in the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank that prompted China to initiate the formation of the AIIB and the BRICS countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) to establish the New Development Bank, formerly referred to as the BRICS Development Bank.
For decades, developing countries have been complaining about the developed countries maintaining their grip on the voting power in the Bretton Woods institutions, because the quotas agreed upon 70 years ago do not reflect the vastly increased shares of the emerging economies in theworld economy. Even the mild reform agreed by all that the quotas would be changed slightly in favor of some developing countries cannot be implemented because of US Congress' opposition.
Moreover, the unjustifiable "understanding" that the heads of the World Bank and the IMF would be an American and a European remains in place despite promises of change.
In response, BRICS set up the NDB, which will supplement or compete with the World Bank, while China proposed the AIIB, which will supplement the Asian Development Bank, which too has a lopsided governance system.
The new banks will focus on financing infrastructure projects, since developing countries have ambitious infrastructure programs and there is gross underfunding.
Critics speculate that the new banks will finance projects that the World Bank or the ADB would reject for not meeting their environmental and social standards. But that is attacking something that hasn't yet happened. True, it would be terrible if the new banks build a portfolio of "bad projects" that would damage the environment further, or displace millions of people without recognizing their rights.
- Global health entering new era: WHO chief
- Brazil's planning minister steps aside after recordings revelation
- Vietnam, US adopt joint statement on advancing comprehensive partnership
- European border closures 'inhumane': UN refugee agency
- Japan's foreign minister calls A-bombings extremely regrettable
- Fukushima impact unprecedented for oceans: US expert
- Stars of Lijiang River: Elderly brothers with white beards
- Wealthy Chinese children paying money to learn British manners
- Military-style wedding: Fighter jets, grooms in dashing uniforms
- Striking photos around the world: May 16 - May 22
- Robots help elderly in nursing home in east China
- Hanging in the air: Chongqing holds rescue drill
- 2.1-ton tofu finishes in two hours in central China
- Six things you may not know about Grain Buds
Most Viewed
Editor's Picks
Anti-graft campaign targets poverty relief |
Cherry blossom signal arrival of spring |
In pictures: Destroying fake and shoddy products |
China's southernmost city to plant 500,000 trees |
Cavers make rare finds in Guangxi expedition |
Cutting hair for Longtaitou Festival |
Today's Top News
Liang avoids jail in shooting death
China's finance minister addresses ratings downgrade
Duke alumni visit Chinese Embassy
Marriott unlikely to top Anbang offer for Starwood: Observers
Chinese biopharma debuts on Nasdaq
What ends Jeb Bush's White House hopes
Investigation for Nicolas's campaign
Will US-ASEAN meeting be good for region?
US Weekly
Geared to go |
The place to be |