China seeks extra testing of US pork for feed additive
Updated: 2013-02-20 15:52
(Agencies)
|
||||||||
![]() File photo of a man working in his shop selling pork products in Shanghai. [Photo / Agencies] |
China wants a third party to verify beginning March 1 that US pork shipped to the country is free of a feed additive used to promote lean muscle growth, a US Meat Export Federation spokesman told Reuters.
The step comes on the heels of Russia barring imports of US meat worth $550 million a year due to the same feed additive.
Officials from the China's quarantine bureau, which oversees the safety of food imports, declined to make immediate comment, while a spokesman said the country's commerce ministry was unaware of the move.
There was concern that China's requirement for third-party testing could hurt US pork exports to the Chinese mainland and Hong Kong, valued at $886 million last year.
"We have just been notified (by US suppliers) and are checking details with the quarantine authorities," said a trader with a large State-owned pork importer in China.
Beijing maintains that there are serious concerns about ractopamine, despite scientific evidence that it is safe. The United Nations has agreed on acceptable levels.
The quarantine bureau in May rejected a consignment of US pork after tests found traces of the drug.
Li Na on Time cover, makes influential 100 list
FBI releases photos of 2 Boston bombings suspects
World's wackiest hairstyles
Sandstorms strike Northwest China
Never-seen photos of Madonna on display
H7N9 outbreak linked to waterfowl migration
Dozens feared dead in Texas plant blast
Venezuelan court rules out manual votes counting
Most Viewed
Editor's Picks
![]()
|
![]()
|
![]()
|
![]()
|
![]()
|
![]()
|
Today's Top News
Boston bombing suspect reported cornered on boat
7.0-magnitude quake hits Sichuan
Cross-talk artist helps to spread the word
'Green' awareness levels drop in Beijing
Palace Museum spruces up
First couple on Time's list of most influential
H7N9 flu transmission studied
Trading channels 'need to broaden'
US Weekly
![]()
|
![]()
|