FOSHAN, Guangdong: Zhang Hai, former president and CEO of the Jianlibao
Group, appeared in court yesterday accused of embezzling vast amounts of money.
The Jianlibao Group, set up more than two decades ago in Foshan, South
China's Guangdong Province, is one of China's leading sports beverage producers.
Zhang Hai. [file]
|
Sources with the Foshan Intermediate People's Court said Zhang had allegedly
embezzled public funds totaling 235 million yuan (US$29.4 million) during his
time with the company.
Zhang, 34, who has been in custody for more than a year, after being detained
by local police on March 24, 2005, denied all charges against him.
"All evidence from either my former partners or Zhu Weisha is wrong," Zhang
told the court.
Zhu Weisha, who took over as Jianlibao president after Zhang, was also
detained last year but was released on bail pending trial.
Zhang, regarded as a mogul of China's capital market, took over as Jianlibao
president and CEO in early 2002, after he claimed to have purchased 75 per cent
of the group's shares.
Under Zhang's management, Jianlibao diversified its operations, making a
series of equity investments, until a halt in the supply of raw materials
brought production almost to a standstill in mid-2004.
Zhang was removed from his post as president and CEO later in August 2004.
Many of Zhang's assistants and suboridnates, including Zhu Weisha, have also
been detained by local police for further questioning.
"What prosecutors provide today is not based on facts," said Xu Yufa, one of
Zhang's lawyers.
"The fact is that all funds involved in the case flowed between Jianlibao's
shareholders and the company, rather than going directly into Zhang's personal
bank account," he said in an interview with China Daily yesterday.
Prosecutors revealed some evidence against Zhang yesterday. But Zhang's
lawyers have so far dismissed all of it.
According to Xu, Zhang was not accused of "economic crimes" but "penal
offences" by the Foshan procurator.
The trial will continue today in the Foshan Intermediate People's Court. No
court sources have yet indicated what verdict may be reached.