WORLD> Africa
UN Security Council remains divided on Zimbabwe issue
(Xinhua)
Updated: 2008-07-09 11:45

UNITED NATIONS - The UN Security Council remained divided on the issue of Zimbabwe on Tuesday as Western powers pressed for targeted sanctions against President Robert Mugabe and his top aides.

Zimbabwe's President Robert Mugabe disembarks from a plane upon arriving at Harare International airport, July 4, 2008. [Agencies]

The United States circulated a draft resolution last week, urging the 15-member body to impose an arms embargo on Zimbabwe and freeze the asset of Mugabe and 11 other senior officials and restrict them from traveling abroad.

On Tuesday, the council heard a briefing by UN Deputy Secretary- General Asha-Rose Migiro on the latest developments in Zimbabwe before going into closed consultations over the US draft.

Push or early vote

Emerging from a council meeting, US Ambassador Zalmay Khalilzad said Tuesday that he expects the council to vote on the draft resolution as soon as this week.

The US envoy said that enough votes have been garnered for the draft to be adopted.

"Absent a veto, which we do not anticipate, the votes are there to move forward on this resolution," he said. "I expect a vote on this resolution this week as soon as possible."

France's UN Ambassador, Jean-Maurice Ripert, also expressed hope for a vote this week, saying that the cosponsors have secured nine of the 15 votes needed to pass the resolution.

"It's obvious there is global support for tougher measures," Ripert said.

Division in the council

Khalilzad acknowledged that there are also "differences of view on exactly what should be done," with some members arguing for political pressure only.

Related readings:
 US envoy expects vote on sanctions against Zimbabwe this week
 UN supports African mediation efforts on Zimbabwe issue
 US introduces draft UN resolution on Zimbabwe sanctions

His Russian counterpart, Vitaly Churkin, told reporters that the UN Charter "does not empower the Security Council to interfere into the internal affairs of a state unless the situation there poses a threat to international peace and security."

"There are serious questions in our mind if the situation in Zimbabwe can be characterized as a threat to international peace and security," Churkin said.

   Previous page 1 2 Next Page