Washington - Military commanders in Iraq are developing a plan to move as 
many as 5,000 US troops with armored vehicles and tanks into Baghdad in an 
effort to quell escalating violence, defense officials said Thursday. 
As part of the plan, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld on Thursday 
extended the tours of some 3,500 members of the 172nd Stryker Brigade Combat 
Team. The unit, which has been serving in northern Iraq, was scheduled to be 
leaving now, but instead, most of its 3,900 troops will serve for up to four 
more months. It was unclear whether the unit would go to Baghdad. 
 
 
 | 
    Hassen Abdula holds his daughter Yakim, 2, as 
 he mourns the death of his two sons killed in a rocket attack on their 
 apartment building, Thursday, July 27, 2006, in a Shiite controlled area 
 of Baghdad, Iraq. A mortar barrage followed minutes later by a car bomb 
 blasted Baghdad's upscale Karradah district Thursday, killing 31 people 
 and wounding 153, police said. [AP]
  | 
Under the plan to bolster security in Baghdad, US troops would be teamed with 
Iraqi police and army units and make virtually every operation in the city a 
joint effort, one military official said. Another said movement of some troops 
into Baghdad had already begun. 
At the same time, the Pentagon signaled plans to maintain or possibly 
increase the current level of about 130,000 troops in Iraq, by announcing that 
roughly 21,000 Army soldiers and Marines have been told they are scheduled to go 
to Iraq during the current 2006-2008 rotation. 
Combined with two previous announcements of about 113,000 US service members 
scheduled for the rotation period, this could bring the number of U.S. troops 
there to 134,000, if all are deployed. 
Military commanders have said deployments depend on conditions in Iraq. But 
the latest announcement calls into question whether the Pentagon could 
significantly reduce troop levels in Iraq by year's end as commanders had hoped. 
As part of the Baghdad security plan, all flights out for soldiers currently 
at the end of their deployment were canceled as of Tuesday, as commanders 
wrestled how to supply troops for the effort, a third official said. 
All spoke on condition of anonymity because the plan had not been finalized. 
Rumsfeld, meanwhile, met privately with lawmakers on Capitol Hill throughout 
the day Thursday to discuss funding needed for troops and the replacement or 
repair of equipment damaged in combat. House and Senate Republicans are weighing 
next year's defense spending bills amid reports that Army units are woefully 
ill-equipped and need billions of dollars to recover from the war. 
"There is no question that resetting the force after the heavy usage that's 
occurred costs money and will have to be funded in supplementals for a period of 
time," said Rumsfeld, who predicted that funds may be needed for up to three 
years after the war ends.