China reforms death penalty trials in 2006: Top Judge (Xinhua) Updated: 2006-03-11 09:46
To promote meticulosity in meting out capital punishment, top judge Xiao Yang
said Saturday that Chinese courts will start from this year to open court
session when hearing death sentence trials in second instance, after taking
steps to retrieve the power of death penalty review from provincial courts.
Xiao Yang,
president of the Supreme People's Court, delivers his work report to the
annual session of Tenth National People's Congress in Beijing, March 11,
2006. [Xinhua] |
"As of July 1, 2006, all the second-instance trials of death sentence cases
shall be heard in open court,"" Xiao, who is also the president of the Supreme
People's Court (SPC) said in his report on the work of the Supreme People's
Court.
This represents another step taken by the SPC to reform court system
concerning the capital punishment, after it announced to retrieve the power of
death penalty approval from provincial higher people's court in October 2005.
By now, the SPC has established three special criminal tribunals and
transferred judges from local courts to the SPC, for reviewing the death penalty
cases, according to SPC sources.
"To try second-instance death penalty cases in the open court session is
conducive to improving protection of human rights. It serves as a procedural
guarantee for preventing misjudge in death sentence cases," said an official of
the Supreme People's Court in an Xinhua interview.
He disclosed that in the past, many courts failed to hear death penalty cases
in second instance in public as provided for by the law.
From the beginning of 2005, Chinese media exposed several misjudged death
sentence cases, criticizing that courts lack a cautious attitude toward the
trial of death penalty.
In October 2005, the Supreme People's Court issued its Second Five-Year
(2006-2010) Reform Plan, which says that people's courts shall open court
session for death sentence cases in second instance.
When trying capital penalty cases in second instance, people's courts should
carefully hear the reasons of appeal or protest and review the evidences in
dispute, the SPC official said.
If necessary, important witnesses of plaintiff or the accused should be asked
to attend the court session, and courts should make all efforts to safeguard the
rights of the accused and avoid wrong judgement in death sentence cases, he
said.
|