EU rejected Iranian offer on atom crisis: diplomats (Reuters) Updated: 2006-03-05 16:23
During crisis talks with EU powers over its nuclear activities, Iran offered
a two-year moratorium on industrial-scale nuclear fuel enrichment while
continuing its nuclear research, diplomats said.
French Foreign
Minister Philippe Douste-Blazy, Iran's top negotiator on issues of
national security Ali Larijani and EU foreign policy chief Javier Solana
(L-R) pose for photographers in the German residence in Vienna March 3,
2006. [Reuters] | But EU diplomats rejected
the offer saying it would not allay concerns that Tehran secretly wants to build
atomic bombs. One European diplomat familiar with the talks said the EU had
demanded up to a 10-year moratorium, which Iran rejected.
"Larijani's offer was no basis for a compromise," one diplomat said,
referring to the chief Iranian negotiator, Ali Larijani. "The offer made no
sense to us."
The failure of Friday's Vienna encounter between Iran and foreign ministers
and diplomats from Germany, France and Britain paves the way for possible UN
Security Council action against Iran after the UN nuclear watchdog, the IAEA,
meets next week.
EU leaders said Larijani offered nothing that could underpin a solution to
the crisis, but that he displayed a more conciliatory, constructive tone than
the defiance of the past.
Larijani, in an interview with Austrian newspaper Kurier due to be published
on Sunday, brushed aside the failure of the talks with the Europeans, and
indicated that ultimately what mattered was how the United States negotiated
with Iran.
He also criticized Washington, saying it had shown double standards by
signing trade deals with nuclear power India in recent days, while refusing to
treat with Iran.
"One land builds atomic bombs and the USA signs contracts with it, and the
other wants nuclear energy for peaceful purposes. Anarchy reigns in
international law," Larijani said.
In their talks, EU3 diplomats said Larijani offered the two-year moratorium
on efforts to establish commercial-scale production of enriched uranium, the
fuel for civilian nuclear power reactors or, if purified to a high level,
weapons.
He further said Iran would again permit short-notice inspections by the
International Atomic Energy Agency that it barred in retaliation for a February
4 vote of the IAEA's governing board to report Tehran to the Security Council.
An Iranian diplomat close to the talks said there was "a high possibility to
reach an agreement with the EU3" based on Larijani's overture, three days before
the IAEA board convenes in a likely precursor to Security Council involvement.
U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, speaking on a trip to Pakistan,
said that even if the IAEA reported Iran to the Security Council, sanctions
against the Islamic Republic were unlikely to be the first step in dealing with
the crisis.
BOMB POTENTIAL
In their talks, EU diplomats noted that Iran planned to start installing
3,000 centrifuges later this year.
About 1,500 centrifuges running optimally and non-stop for a year could yield
enough highly enriched uranium for an atomic bomb, nuclear scientists say.
"Their insistence on R&D seems to encompass the 3,000 centrifuges. So
this was no basis for compromise as far as we could see," said one EU3 diplomat.
Iran, which says it wants only nuclear-generated electricity for an expanding
economy but hid fuel research from the IAEA for 18 years and publicly calls for
Israel's destruction, eventually wants to bring 50,000 centrifuges on line.
French, British and German leaders repeated to Larijani the gist of the IAEA
board's February 4 resolution -- Iran must shelve enrichment-related work to
overcome international mistrust and spawn fresh negotiations on trade
incentives.
These could revolve around Russia's offer to enrich uranium for Iranian
civilian reactors under a joint venture to prevent possible siphoning into bomb
production on Iranian soil.
Iran insists on a sovereign right to peaceful nuclear know-how like other
countries party to the Non-Proliferation Treaty. Iranians officials have warned
that any Council step to impose sanctions on Iran could drive it out of the NPT.
IAEA chief Mohamed ElBaradei has warned Western officials pushing for
Security Council intervention that the world may have to live with small-scale
enrichment activity in Iran under any future deal, officials close to the agency
say.
Russia and China, both veto-wielding permanent powers on the Council and with
heavy investments in Iran, reject isolating Tehran with sanctions as mooted by
the United States
|