Home>News Center>Life
         
 

Qualified Chinese economists no more than five?
By Hector Lee (mranti)
Updated: 2005-11-11 09:52

2005 is an eventful year for Chinese's mainstream economists, who have been plunged into stern criticism both from the public and on the Internet. Reflection on the current status of China's economics may lead to a retrospect of China's reform and policy. Therefore China Business Times (CBT) had an interview on Oct 26 with Professor Ding Xueliang, a sociologist from the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.


HK sociologist Ding Xueliang with the HK University of Science and Techonology [baidu]
CBT: During the past two decades, it seems that only economists have been playing in the intellectual arena, compared with other disciplines. They seem to have an exclusive edge to affect our government's policy and become the limelight in the China's opening-up and reform process. What's your comment on this?

Ding: In the past quarter century, we implemented our reform and policy without considering sustainable development and a harmonious society. We always stick to one subject and ignore others at the same time; this easily causes us go astray. Some interest groups have emerged that are hard to ignore. The cost will be expensive if we want to make things up.

During the past two decades, many people believed it was the economists' responsibility to develop the economy, and economists were the only ones who could speak out among the "silent majority." However, this is far from the truth. In a mature and sustainable society, developing the economy is a systematic project. Disciplines like law, sociology and political science all play their own part in the policy-making process. Their impact may not be overwhelming, but they cannot be replaced. Sociology focuses on social structure and fairness. Law emphasizes procedure and justice. Political science concerns the government's efficiency and cost. Each discipline has its own approach, so there should not be a dominant discipline that muffles the others. You've seen the English term "social studies?" The term is plural rather than singular. We need different voices; we need dialogue and argument based on a normal environment. Policy making should be a systematic project and should be made by comprehensively understanding the essence of various disciplines.

CBT: How do you judge China's contemporary economics?

Ding: In those western countries whose economics are advanced and developed, these disciplines are deeply professionalized, like physics and mathematics. Their topics are professional and profound. How could economics become such a communal discipline?

China's economics are too popular. Too many people claim to be economists, and they dare to talk about everything. This means China's economics are still young and far from being a serious discipline, let alone a science. True science can't be so popular.

CBT: what do you think of the misleading policies made by economists, like those in education reform?

Ding: Over a long period, a couple of so-called economic problems were not real economics problems; they belonged to another area in international practice. But experts from other areas were silenced while economists become talkative. And since China's economics were still young, many un-economic solutions and arguments which pretend to be economic led to more leeway in policy-making.

CBT: During the past two years, more and more mainstream economists have been blamed in public and on the Internet. How do you explain that?

Ding: This is complicated. One important reason is those mainstream economists spend too much time on speaking for a certain interest group and too little time studying. You can find many interest group spokesmen among Chinese economists. Yes, it is true that there are also western economists who play such roles, but they are few. And the most distinctive western economists never do such things. They may be hired by banks and investment banks to study industrial economics. Most so-called Chinese economists act like economic analyzers in a western bank; they only speak for their employer's industry. But in terms of professional quality, they cannot even be compared with an economic analyzer. The best western economists are professors and researchers in top university economics departments.

CBT: Are there any qualified economists in China?

Ding: I think there are no more than five. Some of the most famous Chinese economists are not even qualified to be postgraduates in the world's top 50 economics departments. Some economists long for the Nobel Prize, but they contribute nothing.

A real economist should make academic research the first priority, not personal wealth, fame and rank. In western society, some economists become officials in government and big banks, but only after they have made distinguished and independent research achievements. And one day, they expect to return to their original field and resume research. Wealth, fame and rank are not their goals.



Jolie & Becks, gays 'dream partners'
Zeta-Jones has a 'killer' night in N.Y.
International Acrobatics Festival in Shijiazhuang
  Today's Top News     Top Life News
 

Beijing: Bush-Dalai Lama meeting negative

 

   
 

US$1.7b deals dominate Hu's German agenda

 

   
 

Three Chinese killed in Jordan bombing

 

   
 

US embassy retracts terror warning

 

   
 

Migratory birds come under microscope

 

   
 

China: Topping US in medals 'impossible'

 

   
  Qualified Chinese economists no more than five?
   
  'Go-getter,' 18, ousts mayor in Michigan
   
  Geisha the person vs geisha the actress
   
  Brotherly love helps in times of trouble
   
  Microwave your bra to stay warm this winter
   
  China banning alcohol sale to minors
   
 
  Go to Another Section  
 
 
  Story Tools  
   
  Feature  
  Could China's richest be the tax cheaters?  
Manufacturers, Exporters, Wholesalers - Global trade starts here.
Advertisement