Opinion>World
         
 

Japan pursues military ambitions
HU XUAN  Updated: 2003-11-26 08:15

In a controversial move that would overturn a longstanding ban on weapons exports, Japan's Defence Agency has signalled it wants to jointly manufacture missile parts with the United States.

The newspaper Asahi Shimbun revealed on Monday that the Defence Agency is seeking 134.1 billion yen (US$1.2 billion) in the next fiscal budget to purchase a missile system developed by the United States. It would deploy the surface-to-air Patriot Advanced Capability-3 (PAC) system in the Kanto region along with an Aegis destroyer-based standard Missile 3 (SM3) system.

The two countries are currently trying to produce a more effective system than the SM3 which would be able to destroy a wider range of incoming ballistic missiles more quickly.

This would require revising Japan's current ban on arms exports which was adopted by the Japanese Government in 1976.

Liberal Democratic Party executive Fumio Kyuma, a former Defence Agency director-general, said on Friday that it is time to rethink the export ban.

During his meeting with US Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld on November 15, Defence Agency Chief Shigeru Ishiba said the export ban was a key obstacle to joint mass production of the new missile defence system.

These remarks were undoubtedly intended to add momentum to debate about the ban within the ruling coalition.

But the Japanese Government is again exaggerating the so-called threats posed by neighbouring countries to realize its long pent-up military ambitions.

In the annual white paper released by its Defence Agency in early August, the Japanese Government stressed the importance of a missile defence system against alleged nuclear threats from the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK). Therefore, Japan argued that the collaboration with the United States on the research and deployment of a missile defence shield is a justifiable means of self-defence and also a deterrent to any future threats.

But this justification is unconvincing.

The possibility of the DPRK launching a military attack against its economically and militarily much stronger neighbour is slim.

The possibility of the peaceful resolution to the nuclear crisis on the Korean Peninsula through development and deployment of more sophisticated weaponry is also extremely slim.

What Japan really needs to rethink is its security policies on expanding its international presence rather than its current ban on the export of weapons.

(China Daily )


 
  Story Tools