British Prime Minister Tony Blair announced a parliamentary inquiry Wednesday into the case his government made for attacking Iraq as he sought to crush claims he hyped up weapons evidence to justify war.

Blair, accused of pressing intelligence agents to "sex up" a dossier on Iraq's arms programs, pledged to cooperate with the probe by Parliament's Intelligence and Security Committee.

"Rather than having allegations made by anonymous sources -- allegations that are completely untrue -- if people have the evidence, let them present it" to the committee, Blair said.

But skeptics, some from his own Labor Party, accused Blair of fudging an inquiry, given that the committee answers to him.

The opposition Liberal Democrats, saying Blair's credibility was on the line, moved a motion calling for an independent probe, but Labor's huge parliamentary majority meant that motion was defeated by 301 to 203 votes.

Blair risked his premiership and split his party by defying public opinion to send troops into Iraq, but he appeared to have emerged unscathed after Saddam Hussein's swift fall.

The failure however to discover any of Iraq's suspected chemical, biological or nuclear weapons -- the original Anglo-American motive for war -- has put him back in the dock.

The dispute over Saddam's weapons exploded after the BBC last week cited an anonymous intelligence source as saying Blair's office pressed intelligence services to include a claim that Iraq's weapons could be deployed within 45 minutes.

The heated debate took a new twist Wednesday after senior government minister John Reid accused "rogue elements" in the security services of seeking to undermine the government.

Blair's office said it stood by Reid's comments but noticeably declined to repeat them. His remarks raised more questions from legislators about the reliability of the intelligence agencies and the need for an in-depth inquiry.

One security source told Reuters "there was a degree of cherry picking" in the presentation of the arms dossier but the source said it was based on information available at the time.

Blair's critics pointed out that the intelligence committee, which scrutinizes the intelligence services, is closed to the public and that Blair can omit information he deems sensitive from the final report.

The Foreign Affairs Committee of Parliament's lower house also plans to probe the evidence given on Saddam's weapons.

The probes coincide with planned Senate committee hearings in Washington over the U.S. government's grounds for war.

Given the British inquiries' limitations, legislators looked set to keep up the pressure on Blair.

Close

Today's Top News		Top International News
+The next great leap after Shenzhou V ( 2003-10-21) +Hu calls for balanced development ( 2003-10-21) +Report: SARS not airborne virus ( 2003-10-21) +Japan urged to resolve weapons issue ( 2003-10-21) +Int'l AIDS group opens Beijing office ( 2003-10-21)		+US hopes Iraq fund will attract donors ( 2003-10-21) +Bolivia ex-president vows to return ( 2003-10-21) +UN report: US war on terror radicalizes Arabs ( 2003-10-21) +Israel raids in Gaza kill 10, wound 100 ( 2003-10-21) +EU ministers arrive in Iran for nuclear talks ( 2003-10-21)