CHINA> National
|
China to legalize private lending to ease rural credit pressure
(Xinhua)
Updated: 2009-03-04 23:21 STILL EXPERIMENTING However, rural financial reform is still at the experimental stage and more needs to be done to address capital shortages. "Village banks and other new rural financial institutions have been established in some pilot areas of the countryside in recent years. These institutions need time to expand their coverage and improve services to satisfy more capital-hungry farmers nationwide," said Zheng. The national 4 trillion yuan economic stimulus plan, announced last November, won't do much to help individual farmers. The plan allocates 370 billion yuan for rural investment, but it will go to livelihood and infrastructure construction over the next two years, according to researcher Li Jing with the Futures and Securities Institution of China's Central University of Finance and Economics. "Legalizing private lending will help to revive the rural money market under the economic downturn," said Li. INVISIBLE BUT IMPORTANT Private lending is difficult to quantify or control. It refers to capital-raising activities outside of banks and financial institutions. Restricted by its unauthorized status, it is underground and based upon mutual trust between lenders and debtors. "Private lending is nothing new. Rural households that run a small business have been benefited most. And its advantages compared to formal lending are obvious," said Li. As loans by informal lenders are made to acquaintances, lenders could easily stay on top of borrowers' credit standing and payment ability. In addition, simple and flexible lending procedures and low transaction costs could better meet small borrowers' needs, he said. By contrast, borrowing from formal financial institutions would always require rural households to provide collateral. POPULAR BUT PRICEY Since the industry is illegal and therefore not regulated, it's hard to determine exactly how big it is. But a number of universities, think tanks and other institutions have come up with a range of estimates. A survey by Tsinghua University in 2008 showed that about 69 percent of rural households in eight provinces had borrowed from private lenders. The university's Economic Management Institute also found that about 40 percent of the 120 million capital-hungry farmers couldn't borrow anywhere. The university estimated the capital gap in China's rural money market at 1 trillion yuan last year. China Development Bank has forecast that the capital shortage in rural China would hit 5.4 trillion yuan by 2010 and 7.6 trillion yuan by 2015 if the situation didn't improve. Citing his field surveys in Zhejiang and Fujian provinces, Zheng said each private loan in affluent coastal cities usually ranged from 100,000 yuan to 2 million yuan. In rural areas, however, loans could be as small as 10,000 yuan. For those who got scarce capital, the interest rate was often three to 12 times higher than the benchmark one-year lending rate, which currently stood at 5.31 percent, he noted. By legalizing and regulating private lending, the government could also clamp down on loan sharks and better protect the legitimate interests of lenders and borrowers, Zheng said. SUGGESTED REGULATIONS The deputy director of the PBOC's Research Bureau, Liu Ping, said the "biggest breakthrough" in regulating private lending would be to allow individuals to lend, on condition that the loans represented their own capital. Researcher E Yongjian with the Bank of Communications said that such a restriction would help prevent financing of illegal activities and money laundering. The required registered capital, credit ceilings and interest rates were still under study, PBOC sources said. Zheng suggested building flexibility into the regulations to reflect conditions in different regions. For example, he said, "registered capital requirements should range from 100,000 yuan to 200,000 yuan in underdeveloped western rural regions. In affluent coastal cities, 1 million yuan is considered suitable." Also, the entry threshold should not be too high. An even lower threshold, of perhaps less than 100,000 yuan, "would bring in more market players, which would limit room for usury," Zheng said.
|