A senior World Trade Organization (WTO) official said in Geneva on 
Friday that China was not to blame for the huge US trade deficit and Washington 
could not solve this problem through protectionism. 
"Trade imbalance with China has given rise to certain proposed measures in 
the Congress, and clearly the US administration is watching that particular 
imbalance rather carefully," said Clemens Boonekamp, director of the WTO's Trade 
Policy Review Division. 
"But it's not bilateral imbalance that you need to worry about,and to put it 
in more economic terms, the actual overall trade imbalance, the current account 
imbalance, is a result of policies elsewhere," Boonekamp told reporters after 
the WTO's three-day policy review of the United States. 
Boonekamp reminded reporters that the US administration and the Congress were 
actually divided on the US-China trade deficit issue. 
"I don't think the US administration is actually blaming China. There is, 
however, a lot of political pressure, political noise particularly in the 
Congress that says China is to blame for this in some way or another," he said. 
The official said the current situation with China was in some way a repeat 
of what happened with Japan in the early 1980s, except that the U.S. was not 
taking the same kind of measures that it took very quickly against Japan. 
"The U.S. administration is certainly resisting what's taking place in the 
Congress at the present moment," he noted. 
According to the official, nearly all WTO members expressed their concerns 
about the U.S. "twin-deficits" during the three-day policy review meeting. 
The WTO members also expressed worries that the US fiscal and trade 
imbalances might give rise to protectionist sentiments. 
Asked whether he had given some direct recommendations to the US on the 
imbalances, Boonekamp said he had only indirect suggestions: protectionism is 
not an answer. 
"This clearly is a macroeconomic phenomenon, part of the global trade 
imbalance phenomenon, and not a problem to be addressed by trade protectionism," 
he stressed.