Asian significance of IMF meeting By Eric Teo Chu Cheow (China Daily) Updated: 2006-09-22 14:14
In fact, some Asian and Latin American countries have even floated the idea
of leaving the IMF to form their own regional funds out of sheer frustration.
Twenty-three of the 184 IMF member countries voted against even these two-stage
reforms. Among them were Argentina, Brazil and India, who had earlier argued
that these reforms might not benefit all developing countries.
On the other hand, all the developed economies lost some of their quotas
notably the G-7, which by themselves commanded 45 per cent of the quotas in the
old system. There appear ultimately to have been some justified re-adjustments
to the international financial system, as embodied by the IMF.
But more important, the Singapore meeting carries particular significance for
Asia, in three ways that could be clearly discerned.
First, Singapore's geographic location made this meeting the group's first to
be held on the continent in nine years. It also came nine years after the
financial crisis that shook Asia up tremendously and brought about fundamental
economic, social and political changes across the whole region.
There are clearly still some misgivings about the IMF, which many Asians
blamed in 1997-98 for having aggravated the crisis with "erroneous" policies.
The Singapore meeting was also undoubtedly about Asia's "re-emergence" or
renaissance nine years after this crisis, as it takes a much larger share of the
world economy, led by China, India, the ROK and ASEAN economies. Even Japan, the
world's second-largest economy, is recovering with credible growth and an
inflationary spiral after more than a decade of deflation. Without doubt, the
Singapore meeting will be remembered as the consecration of an inevitable Asian
comeback in world financial and economic affairs.
(For more biz stories, please visit Industry Updates)
|